Everything That Upset the Internet This Week
What is the web-o-sphere angry about this week? A puppy on the runway, yoga pants on women and a mediocre skier. If these are the causes you plan on championing over the weekend, here’s everything you need to know.
Gigi Hadid carried a puppy down the runway at MFW
THE STORY: High-end leather designer Tod’s sent its Milan Fashion Week models down the runway armed with puppies. Most people on social media were charmed by the gimmick — but not everyone was into it. Some users pointed out the hypocrisy of using live animals as a prop in a fashion show that featured fashion made of a dead animal’s skin. Specifically, they pointed out supermodel Gigi Hadid, who modelled a multi-layer look of shearling jackets, leather pants and suede shoes with French bulldog as her accessory. Are we sensing a vague Cruella DeVil-esque vibe?
THE REACTION:
Gigi-with-puppy at Tod's. Interesting accessory choice for a leather house…. pic.twitter.com/YHyMYHM5wu
— Vanessa Friedman (@VVFriedman) February 23, 2018
Tod's had puppies on the runway!!! DOGS! (Also Tod's uses animal leather for their clothing so this also feels kinda creepy)
— paz (@breadpeas__) February 23, 2018
tod’s is a leather house and they used puppies as an accessory on the runway and i’m uncomfortable
— caroline (@carolinenycek) February 23, 2018
RIGHTEOUSNESS OF THE RAGE: Many leather wearing women have dogs — me included. But when you think about it, it’s kind of ironic: we skin one animal for a handbag whilst carrying a different animal in our arms? And the whole thing is suppose to be a fashion statement? Humans are so weird.
HOW WE FEEL:
NYT thinks yoga pants are bad for woman
THE STORY: In a new piece by the New York Times, senior opinion editor Honor Jones wrote a scathing review of yoga pants, accusing women of only wearing them “because they’re sexy” – not because they’re practical or comfortable.
THE REACTION:
You’ve never actually done yoga if you are asking why people prefer to wear tight-fitting while practicing.
This may just be the most vapid thing I’ve read in a good while. You’re about as edgy as my nieces’ hand-me-down Fisher Price silverware, @nytopinion. https://t.co/Ya2Sm1FhxW
— Kylie (@KylieD87) February 18, 2018
listen, folks, we here at NYT Opinion have heard your complaints about our lack of diversity (both ideological and otherwise), our insularity, and our narcissism – and we are here to tell you that we are truly committed to explaining why older women look gross in yoga pants
— KT NELSON (@KrangTNelson) February 18, 2018
Has anyone written about the fact that leggings and yoga pants are important because they don’t *hurt* to wear? Like, congrats if your jeans don’t leave red marks on you by the end of the day, but I’ve never known that life.
— ⛸ Jaime Green ? (@jaimealyse) February 18, 2018
RIGHTEOUSNESS OF THE RAGE: When I saw the topic trending, I was outraged. Is another person really trying to tell women what to wear? BUT reading the New York Times piece in full — which I suggest everyone does — I started siding more with the author. I see where she’s coming from: I would love to wear a sweatsuit to a yoga class! And why do I feel like it isn’t socially acceptable to do so?! There are, of course, lines in the op-ed that are particularly problematic, so I see why women are upset. “Women can, of course, be fit and liberated. We may be able to conquer the world wearing spandex,” Jones writes. “But wouldn’t it be easier to do so in pants that don’t threaten to show every dimple and roll in every woman over 30?” YIKES.
HOW WE FEEL: ? ? ?
Gucci models walk the runway with Sikh turbans
THE STORY: On Wednesday, Gucci presented its 2018 Fall ready-to-wear line as part of Milan Fashion Week. A show by the influential fashion brand saw models take to the runway to showcase a new collection while featuring a mishmash of religious and cultural symbols: bindis, hijabs, niqabs, Sikh turbans, third eyes, and Asian architecture.
THE REACTION:
This is unacceptable and offensive @gucci. Wearing another religions article of faith is not fashion, its appropriation! Sikh men are profiled and discriminated against every day for wearing a turban, yet when you put in on a white person, it’s suddenly fashionable and cool?!?! pic.twitter.com/UD0wWjaju5
— Gurpy Colors o(:) (@gurpycolors) February 22, 2018
sikh boys come home crying to their parents after being bullied at school saying they want to cut their hair + take their turban off. OH BUT NOW IT'S FARSHUN DARLING @gucci
— Sohan Judge (@SohanJudge) February 22, 2018
For us Sikhs, turbans are our pride. It’s a reminder of our faith, strength, equality, unity. To reduce that down to a “fashion statement” is beyond ignorant. My Sikh brothers & sisters are HARASSED simply bc they wear turbans. But clearly @gucci doesn’t know what that feels like https://t.co/zHgYz8MYuv
— jaz (@desiavan) February 22, 2018
RIGHTEOUSNESS OF THE RAGE: FASHION’s associate editor Pahull Bains says, “The turban is a symbol of identity, community and brotherhood for people of the Sikh faith, so to see it used flippantly as a fashion accessory reads as tone-deaf and tasteless… If we take Alessandro Michele at his word, that he wanted to create post-identity specimens by splicing and borrowing and mixing from a range of cultures, why were there barely any models of colour in his lineup?”
HOW WE FEEL: ?
Elizabeth Swaney delivers a mediocre halfpipe performance
THE STORY: Elizabeth Swaney, who finished last in the women’s halfpipe event at the 2018 PyeongChang Winter Olympics, completed her run without attempting a single jump or trick. The mediocre skier, who was born in the US but competed as a Hungarian, gamed the system: she racked up enough points to qualify by entering several World Cup events with under 30 contestants.
THE REACTION:
How can you say you want to inspire others when you are doing the bare minimum? Ur not even trying. You just found a loophole and now you are there. How come you haven't gotten better since the circuit? Just shameful.
— Gilbert G. (@559onan) February 19, 2018
@ElizabethSwaney You're a poser who worked the system, found a loophole & just barely didn't cheat. Shame on you for dishonoring the spirit of the games. You don't deserve to be called and Olympian for any country.
— Wendy Pons (@wdpons) February 19, 2018
The Elizabeth Swaney story isn’t clever. It’s sad. She’s a scam artist with clearly a lot of free time. The Olympic qualifying system needs to be fixed. Two Americans, top 20 in the world, didn’t make it…but an imposter repping Hungary did.
— Britt McHenry (@BrittMcHenry) February 20, 2018
RIGHTEOUSNESS OF THE RAGE: Are people seriously going to hate on this iconic athlete? She didn’t break any rules — and she obviously isn’t doping. She worked hard to make her dream come true, and that is an inspiration!
HOW WE FEEL: ?? ? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ??
The post Everything That Upset the Internet This Week appeared first on FASHION Magazine.